TURNING CAPITALISM INTO COMMUNISM

A History of the Permanent Revolution

Question: With Communism Dead, who will notice its implementation in the Western Democracies?

Answer: No one!
Prologue

The Permanent Revolution is the process of removing all impediments and obstacles to the global proliferation of Radical Capitalism. That when this Radical Capitalism reaches a high level of technological development both socially and economically; it will then evolve into a self-regulating classless society…Communism…a dictatorship of the proletariat based on the premise of “Each according to his needs and each according to his abilities.”

At the start of the21st Century, the highly advanced Industrialized Nations (G8), dominated by the Radical Capitalist Class, have advanced to the technological level (thanks to the development of the semi-conductor, the computer, and telecommunications technologies) to create the environment for the implementation of the first elemental forms of Communism.

This feat has been accomplished by creating a global framework to establish Free Market Economics (Economic Democracy) based on global Free Trade. This can be identified as the United Nation’s General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) offspring the World Trade Organization (WTO).

As a result, the concept of national sovereignty has been severely undermined!

The related concept of individual freedom based on the premise every individual is a sovereign established by the Declaration of Independence and the resultant American Revolution has been equally diluted by the establishment of the Constitutional Republic of the American united States.

All this is centered on the Radical Capitalist concept of Commerce. Radical Capitalism only spreads through the increase of trade…Commerece. The freer the trade, the faster Radical Capitalism spreads. The rules for Commerce are the Admiralty Laws. The U.S. Constitution was the framework, created by Radical Capitalists known as the Founding Fathers, to force Americans into this Commerce regulated by the Admiralty Laws.

In short, Free Trade Magic is allowing Capitalism to evolve into Communism!
For this accomplishment, the afflicted “must give thanks” to the Fabian Society and its creation, The Council on Foreign Relations.

Preface

Communism has never existed. And Communism’s sister in revolution, Socialism, has never really existed either.

This requires repeating!

Communism and Socialism as envisioned by Marx, Trotsky and Lenin has never existed!

One of the basic and major tenets of Marxism is before Capitalism can evolve into Socialism and eventually progress to Communism; a very highly technologically advanced Capitalist economy must completely dominate a global society.

Capitalism has only recently arrived at this technological level necessary to create the conditions for a self regulating, classless society known as Communism. This is due in large part to the proliferation of computer technology into society. The computer has given Capitalism the technological ability to solve its greatest flaw, overproduction and under-consumption…known in today’s business jargon as the bottleneck.

For the last 100 years the entire World has been the victim and witness of the greatest “scam” in the entire history of mankind. This scam was the creation of “the myths” or perception that Socialism (in America) and Communism (the former Soviet Union) have existed.

Once this reality is clearly understood it becomes evident all written and perceived histories of the 20th Century are false. This includes the various “conspiracy theories” that have been popular during this same time frame.

Another misconception exists in the minds of the vast majority. This is the false belief that Free Enterprise and Capitalism are the same thing. They are not. In this country, from the American Revolution until approximately 1880, Free Enterprise was the dominant form of economic activity. In the 1880s Capitalism started to challenge Free Enterprise as the central economic engine of the American Republic. Capitalism and Free Enterprise entered into a fierce competition for workers and markets. In order for Capitalism to continue its growth it had to eliminate the existence of Free Enterprise and then consume the newly “freed labor” to work in the Capitalist means of production.

For example:

In 1900 ninety percent of the American population was agrarian and consisted of thousands of Micro-economic systems comprised of small rural Communities. Basically production equaled consumption. Generally unemployment was not a problem. Those individuals that were not Free Enterprise entrepreneurs found employment from the entrepreneurs. Under this system the Federal Government had no debt and the amount of currency in circulation had 100% parity (the government had gold or silver on hand equal to the value of paper currency in circulation).
In contrast, by the year 2000 ninety percent of the American population had been “forced into the cities” with agriculture becoming industrialized and this nation was dominated by one large Macro-economic system, Capitalism’s global economy. Production and consumption of products were severely out of balance. Unemployment became a continuous problem from 1970 until the end of the century and into the next. The Federal Government possessed a large debt (trillions of dollars), the nation suffered from hundreds of billions of dollars trade deficit and the currency was basically worthless when compared to currency value of 1900.

In short, Capitalism grew at the expense of Free Enterprise. As Capitalism grows the amount of workers needed to work in the factories grows exponentially. As the people were forced off the land and into the city they became white and blue-collar workers involved in Capitalism. A portion of this growing work force recognized the growth of Capitalism creates many continuous social and economic problems especially with the introduction of new automatic, labor saving machinery. These people would be the source of radical revolutionaries. They would be equally as radical as their employer, the Capitalist!

In the 1880’s a select group of Capitalists, mainly British and American, referred to in this book as the Radical Capitalist Class (RCC) formed many coalitions with the massive and emerging “White” and “Blue” Collar working class (proletarian) revolutionaries to remove all global obstacles to the spread of Capitalism. Capitalism must continually expand in order to solve the economic and social problems created by Capitalist expansion.

This reality has been recognized by a very small group of scholars as the Permanent Revolution.

Capitalism, as observed by Marx and also realized by the RCC, had one very huge flaw. This was (and still is) overproduction and its handmaiden under-consumption. Capitalism is an inverted economic pyramid resting on its apex that must keep expanding or it quickly gets out of balance and falls into crisis. And when Capitalism is in crisis it quickly erodes into Fascism.

National sovereignty is the single largest impediment to the global proliferation of Capitalism. In the 1880’s the industrialized European Aristocracies and the American Republic stood in the way of the RCC’s eventual goal, global Capitalism based on a self-regulating classless society. The RCC and their allied worker revolutionaries would soon unleash 100 years of War and Revolution to eliminate all national boundaries.

By not understanding this reality, confusion rules over common sense (Marx’s Dialectic). If Communism has never existed then what did Ronald Reagan defeat in 1989? If Communism has never existed then what was the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics (USSR) if it was not Communism? If Communism has never existed then what was all those, “I Know Communism when I see it” Right Wing conspiracy theory “rantings” about?

A fake “Communism was created” and became a convenient “smoke screen” to hide the Permanent Revolution controlled by the RCC. This mythical Communism has gotten the blame for all events of the past century while Radical Capitalism has been preparing the final road to Communism. The result of this of course has kept the RCC’s Permanent Revolution from view.

By the 1980’s “Communism” had served its purpose for the RCC. It had to die. With “Communism” as dead as Marx, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin who would ever recognize its implementation in the United States of America? The answer is simple…No one.

By the end of the 20th Century Radical Capitalism had become known as the Group of 8(G-8) or the Major Advanced Industrial Nations. The G-8 is in the economic and social reform business. The reform being instituted is Free Market Economics, based on international Free Trade through its main tool, the United Nation’s General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). In America this reform process is controlled by the Fabian Society creations known as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission (TLC). Whatever is published in their quarterly publications of Foreign Affairs and Trialouge will eventually become American and Global Economic policy.

In essence, the major Capitalist countries have adopted the policy of “ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS.” One system is to dismantle the “Old Regime” and the other is to institute the economic and social changes (customized to each respective country in the path of the RCC’s Permanent Revolution) necessary to proliferate Free Trade.

Yes! This is the purest form of Revolution!

The “ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS” is politically “gene spliced” down the entire “political and social DNA structure” of this Republic. For example, in America a One Party System (the Republicratic Party), under the control of the CFR and TLC, has been masquerading as Republicans and Democrats-- “ONE PARTY, TWO SYSTEMS.”

A further example is needed to “see the picture.” Jon Sweeny, president of the AFL-CIO enforces G-8 policy on the rank and file workers of America. The AFL-CIO is dedicated to American worker’s protection through Solidarity…BUT… Its leadership endorses G-8’s World Trade Organization (WTO) policy. It is impossible to protect worker’s rights in America and endorse Free Trade at the same time. This is “ONE UNION, TWO SYSTEMS.”

The 2000 presidential elections were very important to the RCC. The RCC has witnessed its greatest gains in the last 100 years and do not want to loose their hard fought victories.

The results of Election 2000 (not withstanding the extensive RCC controlled vote-fraud) demonstrates the American electorate, its Federal government, and its States are completely politically polarized 50-50 around the “ONE PARTY” Republican and Democratic impostures. This is called the Political Center. The larger the Political Center, the more successful is the reform process of ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS.

The reform process is removing obstacles (national sovereignty) from the path of Capitalism converting to Communism. In other words, impediments to the spread of Capitalism are being eliminated.
This is known as the Permanent Revolution!

So, Why haven’t “I” heard about this?

The RCC doesn’t want you to know. It’s history and present are guarded secrets.

Opponents of this premise will brand its creator as a “Conspiracy Theory Nut”. This is no Conspiracy Theory. It is a Conspiracy. Data to illustrate the RCC Conspiracy was collected on this topic in the early 1980’s and then duplicated 20 years later.

The Permanent Revolution is REAL. This book will chronicle the history of the Permanent Revolution by comparing 1900-1919 America to 1980-2000 America. There are several topics and issues touched upon in this book that could be book material in their own right. So, there are items that will appear over-generalized. To cover each issue thoroughly would cause this book to be enormous in length. If this book is successful, the author will endeavor to put out further additions to the thesis presented based on reader’s response and feedback. Although the premise is simple, there is a vast amount of data, too much to be published in a single book.

From November 7, 2000 to December 14, 2000 the world was kept on the edge of their seat asking, “Who’s the next President?” Little did they know the answer was . . . the RCC.

Take the time to read this book. And after reading this book there is only one recourse for the reader, regardless if the reader is from the political Right, Center or Left.

UNITE! You have nothing to loose except your Freedom and the American Republic!

Another issue must be discussed before reading this work. The 20th Century has been rife with Conspiracy Theories; early 20th Century anti-Catholic conspiracy theory, the ever popular anti-semitic Conspiracy Theories, anti-Masonic (Illuminati) Conspiracy Theories and the most recognized the John Birch Society’s Insider’s Theory. All these theories are false because they do not recognize (or ignore) the existence of the Permanent Revolution and are based on the false concept that Communism has existed in various forms since the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution and then defeated by Capitalism in 1989.

The Conspiracy presented in this book, although it may share some similarities to the various popular Conspiracy Theories, is a totally different concept. It is based on the reality Communism has never existed. Even though the many Conspiracy Theories are full of many “true facts and events” they all eventually fail to match history and present reality at some point in time.

Since the Bolshevik Revolution a false war of Capitalism vs. Communism has been at the center of all the Conspiracy Theories. Communism has been presented as the enemy of Capitalism. When in reality Communism will be the end result of Capitalism. To further complicate this issue the Radical Capitalist Class has been successful in equating Capitalism as the Free Enterprise economic system created out of the American Revolution, when in fact, for Capitalism to evolve into Communism all forms of Free enterprise must be eliminated.

As a result, the popular Conspiracy Theories in essence help support the spread of Capitalism thus ensuring the eventual reality of Communism. For example, the John Birch Society (JBS) promotes a theory that influential business and political individuals identified as “the Insiders” have been instituting Soviet style Communism in America. Up until 1989 the JBS also recognized itself as the leading anti-Communist organization in this country. The membership of the JBS was constantly warned about a Communist destruction of the U.S. Constitution, aided by the Insiders, was about to destroy the “Freedoms” in this Republic.

By not recognizing the simple fact that Communism has yet to exist, the JBS theory becomes false. Many a Bircher or former Bircher will “howl” this is not true. They will immediately respond with the question “If Communism has not existed, then what was the system of Government in Soviet Russia, the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics?”

The answer is quite simple.

Lenin and Trotsky were fellow revolutionaries with the Radical Capitalist Class in removing all obstacles to the proliferation of Capitalism on a global basis. Lenin and Trotsky realized; as did the Radical Capitalist Class, that before Communism could be a reality, Capitalism must become highly technically advanced. And for Capitalism to become advanced enough to evolve into Communism all impediments to Capitalism’s proliferation must be removed, especially nationalism and national sovereignty.

Lenin and Trotsky did not trust their Radical Capitalist brothers in Revolution. They felt if the Radical Capitalist could demonstrate their ability to rule the worker class would become enslaved to the Radical Capitalists and be deprived of social and economic justice. Lenin and Trotsky turned on the Radical Capitalist Class in October 1917 and attempted to put the Permanent Revolution in the hands of the working classes. At this point the Bolsheviks became an impediment, like national sovereignty, to the spread of Radical Capitalism. The Russia captured by the Bolsheviks was by no means an advanced Capitalist society and therefore could never evolve into Communism, so a Fascist dictatorial government was created…not Communism.

The Radical Capitalist had a large problem to solve. Lenin and Trotsky had a large propaganda advantage over the Capitalist. Those gentlemen could and were exposing to the working classes throughout the world the source of social and economic injustice, Radical Capitalism, the Permanent Revolution. The Radical Capitalist would counter this Bolshevik threat by falsely identifying the Bolsheviks (and all other enemies) as Communists and then created the false war of Capitalism vs. Communism.

As a result, Radical Capitalism became the champion of “Freedom” by combating Communism. Radical Capitalism could then openly oppose their enemies (other future turn coat allies such as the German National Socialists) and continue to assault its largest impediment being national sovereignty. In the process Radical Capitalism was then free to continue its technological advancement until a social and economic environment existed to create a global, self-regulating classless society…Communism…totally unnoticed by the victim populaces around the world.

Thus, the problem with Conspiracy Theories based on the existence of a false Communism and the fake war of Capitalism vs. Communism such as the John Birch Society’s “Insiders” Conspiracy Theory becomes quite evident. By opposing the fake Communism, the JBS unknowingly supports Capitalism; a Radical Capitalism confused as Free Enterprise that will evolve into Communism, something the JBS claims to be fighting. In short, by opposing the false Communism the JBS supports America’s real enemy.

A Brief Overview of the Thesis

Capitalism has been promoting its revolution for 300 years. Its introduction in America was through the American Revolution of Independence. Between 1776 to the present, the RCC has used War and Revolution to remove obstacles to the spread of Capitalism.

The most immediate goal of these Wars and Revolutions is the proliferation of FREE TRADE. The American Revolution, The Civil War, WWI and WWII are all bound together through the issue of FREE TRADE.

Free Trade destroys National Sovereignty and domestic society, “ONE COUNTRY, TWO SYSTEMS.”

It took the RCC 150 years to bring about a global environment in order to globally proliferate Free Trade which had all but disappeared from this planet by the start of the 20th Century. By 1914 the RCC was prepared to eliminate its largest roadblock to global Capitalism… the existence of the European Aristocracies and the American Republic.

Of course the RCC was to use its War and Revolution cycle in their crusade. Shortly after the end of WWI, there were several Bolsheviki revolutions prepared to finish off the war weary Aristocracies. These revolutions were to fill the political void with the fall of the German Kaiser, The Austrian Emperor and the Russian Czar. Only Russia succumbed.

The RCC used their influence to bring about events to kick off WWI. While the war ravaged on, the RCC was financing and equipping “Communist” revolutionaries through out Europe and North America. The most significant grouping of revolutionaries of course was the Bolsheviki.

The RCC at the end of WWI dominated the peace settlement that resulted in “Wilson’s” 14-point plan. The RCC was prepared to institute Free Trade from the Rubble of WWI.

Two events took place that would undo 150 successful years of Permanent Revolution. The U.S. Senate voted down joining the League of Nations and the “October Surprise,” the Bolshevik Revolution overthrowing the interim Kerensky government.

What a set back for the RCC. The RCC had spent 25 years of reforming America through the Progressive Movement of Left Wing Socialism in both Parties, i.e. Teddy, the Republican, Roosevelt and Woodrow, the Democrat, Wilson--“ONE PARTY, TWO SYSTEMS.” All the reforms were to alter life in America to make ready for the 14-point plan and Free Trade.

The RCC was expecting to have at their disposal, the vast reserves of Russia’s natural resources to feed the machines of Capitalism in Western Europe and the United States.

Brothers in revolution with the RCC, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin had a different plan. They choose that moment in time to seize the reigns of the Permanent Revolution form the RCC and put it in the hands of the worker per Marx’s theory of Permanent Revolution.

Despite the magnitude of this setback, The RCC was to put this uprising in the ranks to their advantage, creating the false war known as Capitalism vs. Communism.

As long as Capitalism still exists, Communism is a “When” not and “if”. According to Marx, Communism is at the end of Capitalism’s evolution. You cannot have Communism until you have a socialist or semi-socialist technically advanced form of Capitalism.

A Socialist knows Communism will follow Socialism, so it was “up to the worker” to throw off the chains of his oppressors and establish Socialism. If the RCC were able to demonstrate its ability to rule, the worker would never gain control of the revolution.

The RCC realized eventually the masses toiling under them were becoming more educated and communications were greatly improving. It would only be a matter of time and the people would start to understand what “was happening” in Capitalist dominated societies. In America they would realize they were on the Capitalist road to Socialism away from Free Enterprise (not Capitalism, Capitalism and Free Enterprise are not synonymous.)

In October of 1917 the Bosheviki double-crossed their Capitalist comrades and seized control of the Russian government attempting to gain control of the Permanent Revolution. So to “cover their tracks,” the RCC's historians, politicians and Media Moguls mislabeled the Bolsheviki, Mensheviki, etc. as Communist. The struggle of Capitalism vs. Communism was invented. Now the former Brothers in revolution could openly wage war on their former allies. Any one that left the Capitalist camp became a Communist, Communist sympathizer or fellow traveler.

To say the least, the Bolshevik pull out put Capitalism in a state of Crisis for two reasons. One, Bolsheviki such as Lenin, Stalin or Trotsky could expose the RCC’s plottings to control the domestic masses. Two, Bolshevik forces could overrun a weakened Europe if the more advanced Capitalist states did not place a buffer zone between Russia and Europe. This buffer zone was to be Nazi Germany. When the RCC is in serious crisis they turn to Fascism, National Socialism. The state controls wages, prices and crime at the expense of constitutional rights of the populace.

Do you see what is coming next?

Shortly before the end of hostilities of WWI the allied nations of Europe and the United States sent troops to Russia to stem the new tide of “Communism” but temporarily failed. There was not much else for the RCC to do until Lenin died or the Bolsheviki failed.

The RCC controlled Stalin, or so they thought. They backed him in a “Coup” of the Bolshevik party and the expulsion of Trotsky from the USSR. But it was soon evident to the RCC that Stalin was no different than Lenin and Trotsky…Stalin became a new Czar Dictator of all Soviets.

Are you ready for some Fascism?

Adolph Hitler was created by the RCC to stop Stalin. Yes, WWII was started to stop Stalin. But alas, Hitler followed in the footsteps of Lenin and Stalin. Hitler turned on his creators. Hitler posed an even bigger threat to the RCC. Hitler had been put into power, by the same members of the RCC just as Trotsky and Lenin in Russia.

The RCC learned a hard lesson from 1900 to 1945. In order to lay the groundwork for Communism; the domestic economy and society of each Nation must be completely destroyed. WWI demonstrated millions of lives, mashed by war, was not enough incentive to bring about societal change to create the environment for Capitalism to evolve into Communism. Communism had to be built from the dying carcass of Free Enterprise of the American Republic.

In 1945, all enemies of the RCC were basically eliminated. The only opposition left resided in America. These opponents were labeled “Conspiracy theory nuts,” “isolationists,” “protectionists” etc. These people realized something wasn’t quite right with history or the present perception of reality.

To control this newly created Right Wing extremist opposition, the RCC would use Perestroika as a weapon. Perestroika is the act of the RCC creating its own fake opposition groups to identify and control their enemies.

There is another benefit of Perastoika for the RCC. With the creation of false extremist groups the RCC is able to manipulate the growing political, proletarian Center. This almost ensures the control of future political events.

After 1945 Capitalism exploded on the planet, spreading its means of production through the 1947 creation of the UN’s GATT. The RCC then waged war on Free Enterprise by gradually exporting the RCC’s means of production from the American Midwest to the Northeast creating the Rust Belt; unleashing a torrent of imports that would drown the last remnants of Free Enterprise.

This set the stage by 1980 for the Reagan Revolution based on Reaganomics. All the RCC’s best were enlisted in this revolution. Reagan started a great economic reform movement both socially and economically. This reform movement was nothing more than the final destruction of Free Enterprise and placing the entire nation on the world-trading bloc. And the crowning of this revolution was the 1989 destruction of the Berlin Wall. This signified the end of the mythical Capitalism vs. Communism Cold War.

By the year 2000, the RCC had laid the foundation of the Dictatorship “OF” (not by, for or with) the Proletariat. The Bolshevik slogan “Each according to his abilities and needs” was now becoming the way of life in America. “Go Global or Die!”

But in the year 2000, the Capitalist found their Permanent Revolution “In Crisis.” Countless millions of Americans were escaping the Perestroika’s run by the RCC through the U.S. government. The conspiracy was/is facing exposure.

A very fast growing New Left opposition also came into existence at the end of the 20th Century. The great bulk of this New Left is under the age of 30 led by the remnants of the 1970’s New Left that never really got off the ground (these ranks were quickly thinned by a large migration of “Socialist turned Capitalist” referred to as Neo-conservatives). This New Left is dominated by young people, that are really not happy with the political and social legacy inherited from their parents and grandparents RCC “induced ignorance” that allowed the GATT to come into existence and then grow into the WTO.

Candidates from emerging “Third Parties” were also starting to challenge the Republicratic Party’s “ONE PARTY, TWO SYSTEMS.” There was a unique quality to these Third Party candidates. They were from political movements peopled by Perastroika escapees. Most were disavowed Leftists, Rightists, and confused Centrists coming together in a political “Fusion.” The tremendous growth of the political Center is forcing this fusion. If this fusion should continue the RCC could become fully exposed.

In the year 2000, the only thing keeping the RCC in power was control of the electoral process, control of the press, control of the educational process, control of the Federal government combined with the increased use of a Fascism based in Perestroika. The RCC has the expertise to manipulate and control the outcome of elections. If the RCC would loose the White House, the Permanent Revolution would be exposed and ended.

Please put aside all your history learned in school and college. It is a false history. Leave your right wing extremist organization, it is a false doctrine. Members of the several New Left opposition groups…Open your eyes to the Permanent Revolution… it is real.

The expansion of the Permanent Revolution leaves no choice in the matter of survival. The Left and Right must put aside their respective doctrines and agendas and unite in a new common struggle. The election process must be put back into the hands of the people/masses.

Should America’s sovereignty continue to drown in a sea of FREE TRADE and the electoral process not rescued the right to opposition will cease to exist?

The vote is the purest form of dissent. What good is an ideology if there is no form of dissent? The answer is obvious.
Unite!
Unite!

How and why, This Book…

In 1979 the author was a union official in a Semi-conductor plant located in the center of Northwest Ohio. The hourly workers were/are (and maybe not too much longer) represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), which is affiliated with the AFL-CIO. This manufacturing site massed produced the CosMos Semi-conductor for the first time in history. The proliferation of this product type would lead to the computer revolution and explosion which in turn, would raise Capitalism to a technical level envisioned by Marx that would make possible the initial “seedlings” of a classless society to grow in America.

There was one more unique quality of this facility. It was the first mass production point for thousands of newly developed Semi-conductor types straight from the R&D labs for RCA. Usually line yields were higher at the Findlay, Ohio plant than the R&D labs. Once a product type was “proven for production,” RCA would then sell the technology to whoever had the money to purchase. This would include the training of the technical staff of the purchaser and would also advise the customer on the manufacturing equipment to be used (usually superior to Findlay’s equipment).

As a consequence the 2200 workers (blue and white collar) from 1972 through 1985 created and trained their global competitors. Also, at the same time the RCC was putting into place the data collecting capabilities that would force the mutation of Capitalism into Communism. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, the people that work or worked at “the Findlay Plant” were/are “world class competitors” that have most definitely played an important part in history. In 1985 this plant was the single, largest manufacturer of integrated circuits from start to finish under one roof. More than likely almost every household and business in this country owns a device that contains an Integrated Circuit (I.C.) built in Findlay or had is birth there.

The author, who was vice president of IBEW Local #1907 in the early 80’s, was concerned about the passage of what was known as the 1979 Multilateral Trade Negotiations (MTN), the fast-track treaty form for Congressional approval of the United Nations’ (UN) General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). His concern was the GATT would severely lower U.S. tariffs on Semi-conductors and as a result the imports (generated from RCA’S export of technology) destined for our domestic marketplace would erode the job security for the workers of IBEW Local #1907 and the entire American Semi-conductor industry. Remember unemployed workers of the Rustbelt would re-educate themselves and gain employment in the emerging “High TECH Industries.” If not, the worker would join the growing ranks of the chronically militant unemployed.

A legitimate but failed effort through the proper Union channels was made to alert the IBEW to the threat presented to American union and non-union workers.

This was in response to the then IBEW’s International President’s April 1979 monthly address to the Rank and File membership, according to the union’s constitutionally mandated publishing of the IBEW Journal. In that April 1979 issue the International President requested the rank and file “to urge their government representatives to choose implementing legislation carefully” for the passage of the 1979 MTN.

This author found this statement very confusing. The 1979 MTN was the fast track piece of legislation for the UN’s treaty, the GATT. Congress could only vote “Yea” or “Nay” for the 1979 MTN. There would be no implementing legislation.

This was a clear violation of Article XXVII, Section 1, paragraph 7 on page 90 of the IBEW Constitution…”publishing or circulating among L.U.s false reports or misrepresentation.” Eventually this author filed legitimate charges for the removal of the International President from the union for violating this article of the IBEW’s Constitution. This request was answered, by the IBEW Fourth District’s Vice President with the words: “Duly noted and filled.”

When a new contract is negotiated and ratified with the Company, the membership gets a copy of the new contract and a new copy of the union’s constitution. When the next contract was ratified after the passage of the 1979 MTN, this author was shocked to see that Article XXVII, Section 1, paragraph 7 had been removed from the IBEW constitution.

It was at this time the author realized a Conspiracy was at work in this country. As this author started to “propagandize about the GATT, the CFR and TLC etc.” to the rank and file of Local#1907 the IBEW tried to remove the author from the union with an article of the Constitution that no longer existed. The IBEW failed.

Common sense told the author the UN’s GATT would render all jobs in America defenseless. The author knew all America should be forewarned of the growing danger presented to this Republic.

There were few avenues to choose from for the author to go seeking help for the future of the American worker. In 1979 the AFL-CIO endorsed the GATT and its political action committee (PAC) the Committee on Political Education (COPE) blindly backed any Democrat that would vote for this very much Communist U.N. treaty.

At the same time all major U.S. based multi-national corporations urged passage also.

The author by this time also knew the then president of the AFL-CIO, Lane Kirkland, was a member of the New York Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission (TLC) and the CEO of RCA, Thorton M. Bradshaw, shared the same memberships with Mr. Kirkland.

It is no wonder the author became very unpopular with the union and the company when he went “public.” There was virtually no one to turn to for help in “accepted circles.”

The author had only one choice in getting the “word out”. That choice was to approach the American Right Wing. This seemed an odd choice for seeking a voice for labor. The extreme Right viewed (incorrectly) union labor as the closest thing to being a part of the “Communist Conspiracy Theory ” (a Communism that did not exist). But the extreme Right ideology was cemented in some form to an un-provable Conspiracy Theory implicating an East Coast Liberal Establishment led by “Insiders” that was implementing Soviet Communism in America.

The author firmly believed he was presenting “scientific proof” to prove these various Conspiracies Theories correct. The author then noticed the fact that all the various Conspiracy Theories failed at some point when applied to legitimate historical analysis and present realities.

In 1983 the author “stumbled” onto the concept of the Permanent Revolution quite by accident. Suddenly Conspiracy Theories that ended in a confusion of falsities started to “make sense” if the RCC controlled Permanent Revolution was recognized.

The author makes no claim to have invented “The Theory of Permanent Revolution.” There are a few individuals that have made the same “discovery” and have remained “invisible” due to RCC control of the Media and the Intelligentsia.

The two most promising choices for the author to “get the word out” were the August Corporation and the John Birch Society (JBS). These groups were recognized as the most influential adversaries to the Trilateral Commission as recognized in an RCC rebuttal published in the November 24, 1980 issue of Forbes Magazine. (See Appendix E)

The author decided to go with the August Corporation first. The choice for the August Corporation was an easy decision to make. First, the August Corporation accepted the concept of the Permanent Revolution but was not ready to put it into print. Secondly, the founder of the August Corporation, Anthony C. Sutton, had no problem with exposing the “symptoms” of the Permanent Revolution. Thirdly, in the 1970’s, Mr. Sutton was a Teaching Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institute of War and Revolution. He was considered this nation’s leading authority on Soviet industrial and military development and revolution. In short, Mr. Sutton was not considered a “Right Wing” kook hooked on paranoid Conspiracy Theories.

Mr. Sutton published a series of books concerning important events of the 20th Century that effected the lives of every man, woman and child in this country and the world for that matter. The books were Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and FDR, and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler. In these three books one could find many of the proofs identifying the existence of the Permanent Revolution.

In the introduction to Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Sutton clearly identified the reason for the lack of sound academic and scientific proofs of a conspiracy:

“Since the early 1920’s, numerous pamphlets and articles, even
a few books, have sought to forge a link between “International
Bankers and “Bolshevik Revolutionaries.” Rarely have these
Attempts been supported by hard evidence…”

What the author supplied to Antony Sutton was “hard evidence,” real life data on the actions of a multinational corporation and its controlled union participation in a “Conspiracy.”

“…And never have such attempts been argued within the
framework of a scientific method…”

The author assembled a control set of data that was scientifically collected from a “real life environment.” The process of collecting this data would eventually lead the author to the realization of the existence of the Permanent Revolution controlled by the Radical Capitalist Class (RCC). The research done from 1979-1983 would be duplicated in 1995 through 1998, thus making the author’s “theory” a fact of life. But, regardless of the quality of documentation, Sutton continues to observe:

“Examination of the topic by academic writers has been seriously avoided; probably because the hypothesis offends the neat dichotomy of Capitalist vs. Communist (and everyone knows, of course, that these are bitter enemies). Moreover, because a great deal that has been written borders on the absurd, a sound academic reputation could easily be wrecked on Shoals of ridicule.”

Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Antony C. Sutton, 1974, p.11.

Needless to say, Sutton was correct.

Just because this thesis is susceptible to ridicule, does not make the RCC’s Permanent Revolution any less real. It does not lessen the threat to America’s sovereignty and the continued existence of this Republic. One of the most “absurd facts” of the Permanent Revolution is the RCC has complete control of the American electoral process, cornerstone for the existence for this great nation.

So much for the how and why for the writing of this book. Enough background material has been presented. It is now time to provide the evidence for the reality of the Permanent Revolution.

Chapter 1
The First Point of Reference

The official, controlled American history dictated by the RCC has recorded hundreds of thousands of America’s sons and daughters have given their lives making the world safe for Democracy. This shedding of American blood was in the wars for stopping the spread of Fascism, Communism, eliminating Castro from the Caribbean, keeping Sadam Hussein at bay and bringing Slobodan Milisovich to trial for crimes against humanity…not to forget Osama.

This is a false reading of history. All the above events have been part of the Permanent Revolution clearing away 20th century obstacles (national sovereignty) for the implementation of global Capitalism based on FREE MARKET economics (Reaganomics and Clinton’s Democratic Economics) based on Free Trade.

One of the very first great successes of the Radical Capitalist Class (RCC) was the American Revolution. This revolution escaped being branded a Marxist revolution only because it was before Marx was born. When the first shot of the revolution was fired on April 19, 1775 at Concord, it was immediately branded a struggle of Patriotism. The RCC Permanent Revolution was camouflaged for no one to see.

In order to get colonial “buy-in,” the RCC planners (1) declared a Jubilee on all debt to England’s Crown and selected International banks, (2) granted the patriot 150 acres of land and a mule, and (3) would receive payment of $75.00 for each year served to any patriotic man or woman who would take part in the “war of revolution for Independence and sovereignty.”

If you do not know that… blame a teacher!

At the end of the Revolution (1) the Jubilee was cancelled, (2) the land and mule were lost to the “land speculators,” (3) the Patriot got half the money he was promised, (4) the new Government under the Articles of Confederation was attempting to fund itself with an “un-collectible” direct, income tax, and (5) the money in circulation was worthless due to the enormous war debt of the colonies owed to select International Bankers.

If your children don’t know that…again, blame a teacher!

By 1786, the RCC had lost total control of the American Revolution for obvious reasons. The Patriots outnumbered the Capitalists. Remember the American Revolution is continuous until this nation’s sovereignty comes to an end.

The government of the Revolution was under the Articles of Confederacy, which created a Union amongst the colonies, then newly created independent nation states. In many respects this Union functioned much like the unions claim they function today.

In 1786 this government was completely bankrupt. The only funding for the government was based on a direct income tax, which no Patriot paid, again, for obvious reasons.

If you didn’t know that… Well, you do now!

It was to the point Washington and the former Revolutionary General Staff feared the Crown could regain what it had lost. Leaders of the former colonies started to hold “Conventions” to determine some remedy for the economic situation. Eventually a convention was convened in Philadelphia in the summer of 1786. These events have been improperly recorded by RCC historians as the Constitutional Convention. Also, these conventions were illegal, violating Article 13 of the Articles of Confederation. Out of this convention came the United States Constitution which established a Republic with a Federal Government funded 100% from tariffs and excises to be set by the newly created Federal Congress. This was what was put into motion when John Hancock so strikingly signed this document into existence.

Hamilton, Madison and Jay etc., were RCC revolutionaries not any different than Lenin and Trotsky. Yes the Patriots greatly outnumbered the RCC crowd. But… these RCC extremists were prepared to rule after the Revolutionary War.

The RCC main goal had been achieved: removal of the Aristocracy from the shores of America. Remember the Philadelphia meetings were to discuss the economic plight of the Revolution, not to create a new government. When Madison and the boys arrived in Philadelphia they already had a document in hand written for a new RCC controlled Federal government.

(Author’s note: For all the anti-Masonic and anti-Jew conspiracy theory freaks, the RCC has many “partners in crime” to include Masons, Jews, Catholics, Protestants, Quakers, atheists, agnostics, communist revolutionaries and the list goes on and on. At any given time any of “these brothers in revolution” when given a chance will attempt to double cross “this gang of thieves.” The most note-able “turn coats” have been the Bolsheviks, the Soviet Communists, German National Socialists and the Zionists)

When the “final document” was completed after the debates and compromises of the delegates, the RCC politicians Hamilton, Madison and Jay penned a preamble to this Contract. Even though the new states were united in a Union under the Articles of Confederation, the united States of America did not exist. The RCC delegates did not “speak” for the Patriot population. They could only speak for themselves. To denote this most important fact, the delegates capitalized the first three words of this preamble.

“WE THE PEOPLE, in order to form a more perfect
union…”

So, the famous phrase “We the People” is to denote that this phrase refers to the framers of this contract, the RCC… not the colonial Patriots that was required to cast a vote for ratification.

Do you understand what you just read?

When the colonials voted ratification of the Constitution, the Patriot population entered into a “contract” with the newly created RCC controlled Federal Government.

Before the former colonials were asked to vote ratification Hamilton, Madison and Jay penned a series of essays to explain how this “more perfect Union” was to function. These essays are now referred to as The Federalist Papers. This book was to be used by the new Federal Supreme Court as a guide in their rulings to preserve the intent of the American Revolution.

Get the Picture?

The RCC created and controlled the new Federal government and the populace “signed” this contract into being. A Federal Republic, to be 100% funded from congressionally controlled tariff and excise schedules, came into existence. All wealth generated within its borders was protected from all outside influences. The Aristocracy in the Americas had been removed as an impediment to the spread of Capitalism.

How do you know any of this is true?

Answer: All one has to do to verify the above is obtain a copy of The Federalist Papers and read “Essay #12” penned by Alexander Hamilton. All the present “anti-Free Trade” authors and opposition totally ignore this essay.

“The effects of the Union upon the commercial property of
the States have been sufficiently delineated…”

Did you catch the wording? The commercial value of the Union will go up. And who would be most interested in Commercial values?

“…It’s tendency to promote the interests of
revenue will be the subject of our present inquiry…”

Now lets talk about making money.

“…The prosperity of commerce is now perceived and
acknowledged by all enlightened statesmen to be
the most useful as well as the most productive source
of national wealth…”

Man I wish I could talk like that.

“…The ability of a country to pay its taxes must always
be proportioned in a great degree to the quantity of money
in circulation and to the (celerity) …with which it
circulates.”

Keep this phrase in your mind throughout the rest of this book. The concept keeps popping up.

“… It is evident from the state of the country, from the
habits of its people, from the experience we have had
on the point itself…”

Here it comes…!

“…That it is impracticable to raise any very considerable sums of by direct taxation…”

This doesn’t have to be repeated, does it?

Now here comes the punch line.

“… A nation cannot long exist without revenue. Destitute
of this essential support, it must resign its independence
and sink into the degraded condition of province…”

Now remember the RCC created and controlled the Federal government, which entered into a contract with the patriot populace and it was agreed:

“…In this country if the principle part be not drawn
from commerce, it must fall with repressive weight
upon the land…”

Remember the RCC’s goal was to eliminate the Aristocracy from the shores of America. If this new nation did not follow the terms of the contract this nation’s sovereignty would come to an end.

It was expedient for the RCC to create the Federal Republic. Even though they had momentarily lost control of the Revolution, it was more important to establish a method to regain control. The Constitution met the requirements. The fledgling Federal Government now had the bare essentials to protect the independence and resultant created wealth from the Crown. No longer did the RCC face the aristocracy as an impediment in America. And besides, when the Federal Republic would no longer be necessary, it could be dismantled at a later date, which is what is happening today to this nation.

If you are not convinced of this assessment of events in 1786, then when you have the time, secure a copy of the book The Common Sense of the Constitution, by Allyn and Bacon, 1924 and read the introduction.

“The average citizen has rather hazy ideas about the Constitution. Many people have never seen a copy; or if they have, it was so long ago that they have forgotten how it looks. They do not know whether it covers two pages or two hundred. Most of them think it long and involved, when as a matter of fact it is one of the simplest and clearest documents ever written, and is far easier to grasp than ninety per cent of the legal papers today.

We cannot understand United States History unless we keep the Constitution clearly in mind. Nor can we read the news columns of the daily paper intelligently without this knowledge, to say nothing of the editorial page. What can be more futile than to try to wrestle with any phase of the social studies without a clear understanding of the principles which underlie the document upon which our political, economic, and social structure rests?”

You will agree with the concept of history presented in this book; Especially when you read Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. of the Constitution.

“The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.”

Free Trade would not have been acceptable to Hamilton, Madison and Jay. The RCC needed time to grow in a protected environment. They had just fought a revolution against Mercantile Free Trade of the Crown.

Chapter 2
Meanwhile, Back In Europe

Karl Marx and his teachings and followers are to be used as a transition from the War of Independence to 1890s evolved Capitalism.

By this time Capitalism was starting to dominate business and trade in this country and the world. It was large enough to have critics and enemies. The Most famous of these critics was Karl Marx and his Communist Manifesto.

This must be established…Communism has never existed!

“Communism: The doctrine of Marx and Engels, founded on the basis of the materialist conception of history. Communism is the stage following after Socialism and when social classes cease to exist. Communism does not yet exist in any country.”

Marx For Beginners, Rius, 1976, glossary.

Huh?

“Run that by me again.”

Communism has yet to exist. I know the questions you want to ask, but you will not understand/comprehend the answers to those questions until later in this book.

One thing you must understand, there are no simple answers to those questions concerning Communism. The problem is compounded by the simple fact most right wing Americans and surely the great sheep of the political Center have not read any Marx, Lenin, or Trotsky.

So if you insist on asking… hold those questions. A brief overview of Marx’s theory from Marx for Beginners, will answer many of those questions. Please keep the American Revolution in mind as you read.

“As time went on, the merchants and guild artisans grew in numbers and power. They began to shrug off the burdensome “yoke” imposed on them by the Nobles and the Clergy. The first intellectuals awoke, bringing new ideas into daylight. A new class is born, The BOURGEOISIE…”

Commerce thus began to change the form of production.

The Bourgeoisie needed bigger (and free) markets to shift the merchandise produced in their workshops.

See or hear anything familiar yet?

“…Their appetite for profits ran smack against the limits of the Feudal mode of production… and these restraints provoked a series of bourgeoisie revolutions…”

If you haven’t guessed by now the bourgeoisie are the RCC.

“… Against Kings and church leading to the birth of a new system of production… CAPITALISM.”

Oh! please continue…

“The bourgeoisie revolutions were followed by another revolution…the Industrial. Humanity invented machines, which took the place of manual crafts. This completely revolutionized the mode of production…”

The author will deal with this issue later in this volume.

“The appearance on the scene of machine produced goods brings with it a couple of new social classes: Capitalist, or owners of the machines and Workers, or the operators tied to these infernal machines. With machinery comes a new mode of production Marx calls, CAPITALISM.”

Pay attention!

“Now the worker isn’t the slave of a feudal Lord. He’s a “free citizen” (i.e. free to sell himself to the highest bidder)…”

Marx developed a unique theory:

“… the class struggle is inevitable and historical… sooner or later says Marx, Capitalism is going to “have to retreat before a newer and fairer system Socialism.”

Karl Marx for Beginners, Rius,
1976, pps. 130-133.

As time passed for Marx from the revolutionary year 1848 until his death, he would rethink his position. These changes were brought about by Marx’s observation of the permanence of the RCC’s Revolution with the continued growing existence of Capitalism. From this he developed what he called the Theory of Permanent Revolution.

“The disasters of 1848 did not indeed shake Marx’s theoretical beliefs, but they forced him seriously to revise his political program. In the years 1847-8, he was so far influenced by the propaganda of Weitling and Blanqui as to begin to believe, against his natural, Hegelian, inclination, that a successful revolution could be made by means of a coup d’ ’etat, carried out by a small and resolute body of trained revolutionaries, who having seized power, would hold it, constituting themselves the executive committee of the masses in whose name they acted. This body would function as the spear-head of the proletarian attack. The broad masses of the working class after years of bondage and darkness could not be expected to be ripe either for self-government, or for the control and liquidation of the forces they had displaced.

A party must therefore be formed to function as a political, intellectual, and legislative ‘elite of the people, enjoying its confidence in virtue of its disinterestedness, its superior training and its practical insight into the needs of the immediate situation, able to guide the people’s uncertain steps during the first period of its new freedom. This necessary interlude, he termed the state of permanent revolution, guided, by the revolutionary class dictatorship of the proletariat over the rest ‘as a necessary intermediate step to the abolition of all class distinctions, to the abolition of all the existing productive relations upon which these distinctions rest, to the abolition of all social relations which correspond to these productive relations, and to the complete reversal of all ideas which derive from these social relations’. But here, although the end was clear, the means were left comparatively vague. The ‘permanent revolution’ was to be brought about by the dictatorship of the proletariat: but how was this stage to be effected and what form was it to take?

Exile in London, Karl Marx, Isiahah Berlin,
1963, p. 153.

Yes I know, small book and a lot of stuff. If you haven’t guessed I like powerful quotations that are real eye openers.

Yes! What does the next step bring. “Who” is going to be involved?

This is the $64,000 question, Who are the infamous “they” behind the RCC? The answer is quite simple. For the 20th Century “they” were:

“…conservatively pedantic socialism has found its most authoritative representation in the indefatigable Fabian Couple, Beatrice and Sidney Webb…”

Revolution Betrayed, Trotsky, 1932, p.2.

Before Beatrice and Sydney Webb and their creation the Fabian Society is discussed at length, the class of People they represent, the RCC, it is necessary to describe the state of Capitalism in the 1890’s. It is only fair to briefly illustrate their social and economic position in the 1890’s since Marx’s position, based on observing the RCC, has been presented.

Please read on.

Chapter 3
1890’s Capitalism

There have been many political and economic writers that unknowingly describe “symptoms” of the Permanent Revolution but do not recognize the existence of the Permanent Revolution. James Livingston’s, Origins of the Federal Reserve System; Money, Class, and Corporate Capitalism, 1890-1913 is a fine example.

Keep in mind as the 20th Century was about to dawn, Free Trade the necessary tool to spread the Permanent Revolution, was dead.

“By the First World War the Free market had ceased to exist in the most extreme form because it did not meet human needs…”

False Dawn, John Grey, 1998 p.5.

So what was the problem for the RCC?

Well the European Aristocracies still existed. Secondly the American Revolution still eluded their complete controlling grasp. But the “Progressive Movement” would change all this. Now on to Origins of the Federal Reserve:

“I am trying to demonstrate that the programs and social philosophies of reform-minded businessmen and intellectuals were situationally determined…”

…My object is to demonstrate that the movement for banking and monetary reform (ca. 1894-1913) was both symptom and attempted cure of the decline of competitive-entrepreneurial capitalism…

Origins of the Federal Reserve System,
Livingston, 1986, p. 18.

This is similar to the same problems global Capitalism was encountering at the end of the 20th Century. Now pay close attention to Mr. Livingston.

“…I try to show that reform of the financial system was a pressing social question that not only involved, animated, and shaped the outlook of the entire modern-corporate business community; but also produced some of the assumptions critical to modern economic theory, and defined the methods and goals of modern liberalism…”

IBID

Notice this was social reform. Notice also this movement set the tone for modern liberalism. This is the same liberalism the Reagan Revolution supposedly banished from Washington D.C.

Hold on Mr. Livingston is not done.

“I suggest that the movement for reform provided the context within which a modern ruling class came of age…”

We all know who this new ruling class are… the RCC.

“… That this reform movement was the preparatory school in which a corporate-industrial business elite worked out a world view or social Philosophy appropriate to its constituency’s leadership of modern society…”

And here comes the Bullet…

“… I suggest, in other words, that the origins of the Federal Reserve System lie in the awakening and articulation of Capitalist class consciousness.”

By the End of the 19th Century we find the Capitalist Class (the RCC) awakening. This awakening is expressed through social reform. And there were problems for the Capitalist and of course there was no free trade to expand Capitalism’s system. Secondly the Capitalist was not harvesting profits in the quantities they were accustomed to.

“Capitalist did, then, have good reason to fear the future; the relative decline in growth rates is readily apparent after 1873 and quite pronounced after 1884… the late nineteenth century’s enduring “depression” was a shift in the distribution of income from profits to wages or from Capital to labor…”

One of the problems for the RCC is as Capitalism grew so did the amount of workers in a direct proportion. In fact the number of workers will continually grow exponentially larger than the number of Capitalist. It is quite obvious for the RCC to stay in control they needed to gain more control of the Federal government controlling the workers.

(Author’s note: This author is pro worker, pro union but anti-AFL-CIO. Worker in this book is defined as Blue and White collar to exclude those representatives of the Radical Capitalist Class, the CEO and upper-level management).

Labor presented another problem. As the size of the proletariat increases it absorbs more of the wealth produced.

“So large is labor’s share of national income that any substantial disparity between productivity and real wages would exert great impact on the other shares--either largely expropriating them or presenting them with huge windfalls…”

Gee! Doesn’t this sound familiar?

“For example, if real wages are rising because of price deflation and labor
productivity meanwhile is not increasing at a comparable rate, labor will
to that extent “expropriate” capital’s share of national income”.

This was not just a fluke phenomenon. If left unchecked, a crisis for Capitalism of devastating proportions would develop… in favor of the Worker as envisioned by Marx.

“… the disparity between growth in real wages and labor productivity is
most notable between 1884 and 1894: productivity barely improved in
this decade while real wages continued to increase steadily, at a rate of
five to six times faster than productivity…”

Now for all you self-avowed Marxist, non-communist Socialists and dyed in the wool Capitalists, Mr. Livingston describes the classic problem for Capitalism to solve, over production and under-consumption. In today’s business jargon this is called the bottleneck.

“The economic problem so conceived was relative, not absolute: these observers were suggesting not that profits had disappeared altogether, but that capital’s share of national income was declining as real costs for new fixed capital was rising…”

Here comes a priceless gem of observation.

“No sooner has the capitalist fairly adopted one improved machine, than it must be thrown away for a still later and better invention, which must be purchased at dear cost, if the manufacturer would not see himself eclipsed by his rival…”

This is very important. This was the problem to be solved by the Capitalists if they were to retain control of the Permanent Revolution. So important that the above observation requires a supporting second opinion on over production/under-consumption. It comes from a totally different source, The Second Industrial Divide, Possibilities for Prosperity, by Michael J. Piore and Charles F. Sabel.

“To Marx, the specialization of manual work-whatever its immediate impact on productivity-was decisively important because it led to the introduction of special-purpose automatic machinery. Once a human task had been decomposed into its elementary motions, it became possible to build a device that would perform these motions automatically; and as one step of a manufacturing process was thus mechanized, the preceding and following steps had to be correspondingly reorganized, to keep pace with the new machinery. Thus, the introduction of automatic equipment also increased the rigidity of production, making it ever harder to switch resources to alternative uses.”

The Second Industrial Divide, Piore and Sable, 1984, pps. 22-23.

Here then lies the problem the Capitalist was paying so dearly for. Back to Mr. Livingston:

“… Specialization could be activated only by growth in demand. Obviously it made no sense to rearrange the production setup to increase out-put if there was no market for the increase and the rearrangement made it expensive to switch the resources to some alternative purpose…”

And here comes another zinger of a quote.

“…Progress in the efficient use of resources was blocked; unless the market for goods could be increased (by such means of reducing tariff barriers and taxes; decreasing transportation costs; redistributing income to those too poor to buy what they want; and consolidating demand for closely related goods into demand for a single standard product)….”

And the hits just keep coming:

“…Once the division of labor was freed from restraint, however, its advance was theoretically self-sustained…”

Yes, in 1900 the Capitalist needed the existence of a Free Trade global market place… that did not exist. Standing in the way of Free Trade were the European Aristocracies and the Republic of the United States of America. One more appropriate quote is necessary to illustrate the problem presented.

“Like Marx before him (Lenin), he was guilty of a false and subjective reading of history that left him with an appallingly skewed vision of what the future may be like. And not the least of it was his misreading from the start to the finish of how free-market economics would actually fare, and of how resilient was democracy as preserved in Capitalist nations.”

The Keys of This Blood, Malachi Martin, 1990,
p. 224.

Free Trade was the key to success for both the Capitalist and those seeking Communism. In order for a Free Market economy to exist, national sovereignty must be eliminated, as was the English Aristocracy was removed from the American shores.

The RCC realized what Marx, Lenin and Trotsky did not. The problem of overproduction and under-consumption contained billions of future bottlenecks to be eliminated. Not until the advent of the computer would the RCC be armed with the tool to be able to make production equal demand.

But before anything could be done, an environment for Free Trade had to be created. The RCC dedicated itself to this task. And as noted earlier in this book, the leaders of this revolution was to be Sidney and Beatrice Webb, founders of the Fabian Society.

Chapter 4
Value Added / Surplus Value and Profit

Before a discussion of the importance of Sidney and Beatrice Webb’s Fabian Society can be presented, the crux of another Marxist/Radical Capitalist problem must be examined, the distribution of Capitalist created wealth. This will be the most controversial and most important concept presented in this book.

Ask yourself this question: Where does all the money come from that has fueled the fantastic rise of the Stock Markets from 1980-2000?

Ponder that thought deeply before you read on!

The typical answer is as follows. American investors invest their money in companies with the expectation that the company will sell a product or a service that will result in a profit. Out of these profits the Capitalist will then pay a dividend to the investor (and himself) that had been taken at great risk in the pursuit of future profits.

Well, that is pretty easy to understand. There isn’t anything controversial about that. After all, isn’t this the American way? Not exactly!

But, where does the money or wealth come from that becomes profit?

Most people will respond the money comes from the sale of a product that has a price with the profit worked into the price.

Consumers will spend (X) amount of money on a product, commodity or service. The cost of that product, commodity or service will have a wholesale value, which is (X-something). The merchant will then add his mark up which is (X+ something). [(X+something) is the merchants profit]. Add (X-) and (X+) and you get the price of the product (X).

This is true to a point, but it is not the correct answer.

Marx observed:

“What determines the price of any product is competition, or more exactly, three kinds of competition. (1) seller vs. seller, (2) purchaser vs. purchaser, and (3) seller vs. purchaser.

Marx For Beginners, Rius, 1976, p. 100.

When there are several vendors that are engaged in head to head competition they have to enter into a price-cutting contest to succeed in the marketplace. This results in lower prices for consumers. Remember the 1950s and 60s “gas-wars” or today’s “burger wars.”

If there are many consumers competing in the sales frenzy for the same product, then the price of that product will increase. The Cabbage Patch doll craze comes to mind.

Competition between seller and purchaser occurs when the seller wants “to sell high” and the consumer “wants to buy cheap.” The outcome of this competition depends on the first two competitions described.

In short, this is the concept of supply and demand.

“When there are 100 cars and 1000 possible buyers, the price of the vehicle jumps up according to the wishes of the seller…But if there are 100 cars and only 20 buyers, it’s very probable the price will favor the buyer.”

Ibid. p. 100.

Yes I understand; I haven’t described just how a price is determined for a product and where that money comes from.

“Let’s talk about the price of production…an automobile, for instance costs $1000; add to this all the hidden costs such as publicity, public relations excises, the distributor’s percentage, taxes, the producer’s profit…Result? The retail price to the public is $2000…”

Ibid. p.101.

Marx didn’t foresee all the added cost engines that would evolve with Capitalism’s expansion that would ultimately effect price determination. Not only that Marx didn’t realize the variety of ways the producers would “jack-up” the wholesale price of the product for sale.

To understand this another analogy is needed. This author is going to borrow from Adam Smith’s (mythical inventor of Capitalism) famous “Pin-maker” of a village.

Once upon a time there was a “free enterprise entrepreneur” village pin-maker. In his shop worked three men. Each man ran his own machine; one to make the head of the pin, one to make the shaft of the pin and one to attach the head of the pin to the shaft. The pin maker’s shop was able to meet the demand of pins for the village. There was an economic balance; supply equaled demand. All the investment into the costs of manufacturing, to include the wages of his employees, enabled the pin-maker to charge a price for the pins that allowed the pin-maker to make a modest profit. Everyone was happy.

This profit is derived from “surplus value” or “value added” to the costs of raw materials, wages(value of labor) and machine maintenance. The worker’s wages were a reward for having manufactured the pins or to put it another way the wealth created.

Then one day one of the pin-makers employees came up with an idea to build a machine that would perform all the functions of the three machines owned by the pin-maker. The owner did not have the Capital “to turn” the worker’s idea into a reality. The owner of the shop got some of the richer members of the village "to invest” money into the “research and development” necessary to build this machine. These investors were willing to take this risk with expectations for a large return on their investment (ROI).

The pin-maker and investors became Capitalists at this point.
The results were beyond all expectations. Not only did the machine work; the machine was able to produce more pins in one day than the other machines could make in a week. The machine was easy to operate. Not only that, the pin was of a higher quality and cheaper to produce.

Of course the pin-maker had to pay “dividends” to his investors out of the profits that would come from the surplus value or value added from this new mode of production.

The pin-maker was now able, with the increase in production, to “export” his pins to the other villages in his region. He had to in order pay-off his investors and compensate for the over-saturation of the village marketplace. This is the basic flaw of Capitalism, overproduction and under -consumption. And the price of the pin had to be set in order to satisfy the profit needs of the investor and the pin-maker... So as long as the pin-maker could enlarge his markets to off-set the problem of local overproduction and under-consumption the owner and investor is satisfied.

The pin-maker and the investors now had the freedom, due to increased profits to make choices. He didn’t need three employees. With a superior product he could eliminate his competitors in the area villages. So this enabled the pin-maker to control the marketplace and the price of the pins. The investors would not let the pin maker reduce the price of pins. They wanted more return on their investment.

Not only that he could reduce the pay roll. If the employee refused to take a “pay cut,” the shop owner could fire him. There was now a surplus of labor, the two former employees that had worked in the shop. Since they were unemployed, they could be induced to comeback to work even if the wage was lower; a job is better than no job.

In short, money is invested into a manufacturing concern, workers are paid a low fixed wage to create surplus value or value added (created wealth), and the manufacturer and the investors share the value added from the profits from the sale of the pin. The worker does never share in the profit. (See Appendix A)

In order for the reader to comprehend the tremendous importance of Surplus Value or the value added consider the following observation.

“Anyone who blames America’s declining real wages on declining productivity growth, does not understand economics. Ford Motors today produces roughly the same number of cars and trucks as in 1975 with only about half the number of employees. This means that worker productivity there has practically doubled in eighteen years; yet Ford workers have lower real earnings (adjusted for inflation) than they did in 1975.”

The Myth of Free Trade, The Pooring of America, Dr. Ravi Batra, 1990, p. 47.

(Author’s note: There is approximately only 30 minutes worth of labor involved in the manufacture of an automobile regardless of it’s size. This is about $15. Fifteen dollars worth of labor creates a $20,000 automobile.)

This author realizes this is a gross over-simplification, but it does describe the basis and problem created by the Industrial Revolution of Capitalism.

And hopefully the reader now has a concept about value added or “where the money comes from” to pay off the investor. If you do not quite understand this concept, don’t worry, it shows up later in this book. (See Appendix B)

This is important. Capitalism has never been able to solve the problem of overproduction and under-consumption until recently. This is the economic basis of the Permanent Revolution for the Radical Capitalist Class. Labor is the ultimate victim of this paradox not the Capitalist.

Eventually the RCC would envision the solution for Capitalism. This would be the need for a self-regulating classless society…Communism
Chapter 5
About those Conspiracy Theories

The 20th Century was witness to countless thousands of Conspiracy Theories. The vast majority of these theories did/do not include the theory of Permanent Revolution. As a result, these theories are false doctrines.

The biggest proof that these doctrines are false is these “plots” were constructed on the concept of “Capitalism vs. Communism.” As we know Communism has never existed.

All political doctrines are false if the Permanent Revolution is not recognized.

At some point in historical time a theory that does not include the Permanent Revolution of the RCC will fail to reflect “current” reality.

So why all the conspiracy theories?

There are enough people, thanks to expanded advances in computers and communications, that know events that take place are not natural phenomena but have been meticulously planned. As FDR once observed “Nothing in history is an accident, its been planned.” In other words, there will exist people that feel there is more going on than what is seen.

As in physics, which now is looking for the elusive “glue on” particle or force that holds all atomic particles together, so it is with the source of conspiracy theories. What is the single fiber of politics that points to the actual existence of the one true Conspiracy (Permanent Revolution)?

The entity in this case is the Fabian Society. The Fabian Society controls the Permanent Revolution. In the 20th Century the Permanent Revolution, under Fabian guidance became the mother of all political movements from Abortion to Zionism. Eventually all political movements can be traced back to this origin.

It has been the job of the RCC historians to hide the Permanent Revolution. But no matter how good the histories have been written, no matter how good their brothers of propaganda, called spin masters, take care of “real time” events…there will always be enough people that know “something is not right.” Propaganda and History do not match reality.

By recognizing the existence of the Permanent Revolution in the hands of the RCC guided by the Fabian Society, reality starts to make sense, history starts to make sense… and Communism becomes an all too apparent future.

An example or two maybe necessary to illustrate.

By the time the 1960’s rolled around, the dwindling American Right Wing was drowning in the political Center controlled by the “so called” Liberal Eastern Establishment. The more extreme factions of this Right Wing “propagandized” there was a connection between this Eastern Establishment and the Spread of Soviet Communism.

Remember Communism has never existed. So what was the USSR? The point is historical confusion is created. This Confusion hides the Permanent Revolution.

The Right Wing in America has never really read any Marx or Trotsky and if they have, they never understood what was presented due to RCC induced ignorance. And as a result all their conspiracies are based on the myth of Capitalism vs. Communism.

The fear of course was the sell out of American sovereignty to Communism (that never existed). And in defense of their paranoia, the Right Wing defended Capitalism when in all actuality Right Wing Conspiracy Theories have been helping the real enemy, the RCC and the Permanent Revolution.

In the 60’s by far the most influential Right Wing conspiracy think tank was the John Birch Society. At the core of Birchism was a “conspiracy” dominated by what Birchers called the “Insiders.” Every new member to the JBS received a copy of None Dare Call It Conspiracy, (there is a question of authorship so no name is provided). The book is full of good and true historical facts about the JBS envisioned Communist conspiracy theory but fails to recognize the existence of the Permanent Revolution. Every crucial controversial point was well documented. It even associates the Fabian Socialists with the “Insiders”.

Yet in recent editions of None Dare Call It Conspiracy, the Fabians have been dropped from the Index. This is just not a trivia fact. If a reader of this book was to call JBS headquarters in Appleton Wisconsin and ask about the Fabians and the Permanent Revolution and why the JBS hasn’t recognized the Fabian controlled RCC destroying U.S. National sovereignty…The JBS reply would be “you don’t understand the Society.”

Ask them why aren’t they reporting the Permanent Revolution and the Communism that is becoming the basis of life in America? And the reply would be “there is no Permanent Revolution.”

The JBS answer will be interesting but it will not include the JBS is a victim of a false reading of history, (the biggest of sins for Marxists) just like Marx, Lenin and Trotsky. The JBS bases the proof of its conspiracy theory of the “Insiders” on Georgetown University’s Carroll S. Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope as the “gospel” on American History.

As a result the JBS identifies the “Insiders” as the New York Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). The JBS claims the CFR emerged out of the U.S. negotiating team at Versailles after the U.S. Senate voted down acceptance of Woodrow Wilson’s 14-point plan. This is not totally true. The CFR was created by the Fabians to ensure the next time RCC final success for the Permanent Revolution was at hand; it would be a done deal.

For further proof of Fabianism being left out of the history books turn to the Index of the 1360 page book Tragedy and Hope and look for a reference to the Fabians.

There is none.

To the novice in the world of conspiracy theory, Tragedy and Hope, “the Bible” for conspiracists, was written from the archives of the Eastern Liberal Establishment. Professor Emitarious, Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University claims to have had access to the “Secret Stuff” conspiracy theory people “knew” existed. Quigley was no “Crack Pot”. Check out President Clinton’s first acceptance speech for President… He singles out Quigley as responsible for Clinton’s rise to power!

Obviously something is being hidden. And that thing is Permanent Revolution. Anyone that has been in a JBS type organization eventually realizes, “my organization doesn’t go for enough.”

Why and What are they hiding?
Chapter 6
Fabianism, Leader of the Permanent Revolution
The Age of Confusion

The Permanent Revolution is the continual process of removing all obstacles to the spread of Capitalism through the implementation of Free Trade in order to eventually establish a totally self-regulating classless society…Communism.

There is only one organization that has had 100% success in fulfilling the above…The Fabian Society. American RCC historians of all political colors have ignored the importance of the Fabian Society to 20th Century America.

Please keep in mind in 1876 on July 1, the First Socialist International died a silent death in Philadelphia. Marx would spend the rest of his life in London exposed to Fabianism. In a way “Communism” died. It would mutate during this dormant period leading up to 1900. Aiding this mutation would be the Fabian Society.

This transformation would be to Socialism known as Progressivism in 1900 America.

“In politics and in social theory the liberating movement of the Edwardian period was socialism…Because Socialism was a range of ideas rather than an organization, it could assimilate a variety of groups within it… The dogmas of the militant action groups did not govern force, represented in Parliament… The Webbs defined English Socialism.”

The Edwardian Turn of Mind, Samuel Hymes,
1968, pps. 87-88.

From 1886 to 1900 under the direction of Sidney and Beatrice Webb, the Fabian Society clearly turned “Socialism” into a driving political force capable of obtaining control of governments.

Let’s obtain another viewpoint.

“The American people have been and are complacently unfamiliar with Communism’s helpmate, Fabian Socialism… Fabian Socialist movement, which exists under many names in many places, began and grew in Britain… started by a small group of middle class revolutionaries… its respectable influence now pervades the English-speaking world…

Please let me continue with the very to the point political reality,

“In the United States, where its identity has been even more carefully concealed and where its practitioners are usually known as liberals rather than Socialists, it has very nearly succeeded in reversing that movement of National independence which began in 1776.”

The Fabian Free Way, Rose L. Martin, 1963, pps. xii-ix.

In short when 1900 rolled around for America the Fabian Society invaded New York and Washington D.C. Its duty was to continue the RCC’s Permanent Revolution. They aimed to change the world by eliminating European Aristocracies and the American Republic, creating an economic and political environment conducive to Free Trade. Plus 1900 signaled a century long struggle to weaken the very foundation of this Republic’s Constitution. The RCC’s need for the Constitution was at an end. The American Constitution was fast becoming an impediment to the Permanent Revolution equal to the European Aristocracies.

There is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that advocated this country becoming a World Power, but there is nothing in the Constitution to really prevent it. Capitalism was much more evolved in America than in Europe and in 1900 the RCC decided to enter America into International relations.

In 1900 90% of America lived outside the East Coast urban areas. These people expected the next 100 years would be like the last 125 years. This was not going to be the case. By the end of the 20th Century America: 90% of the population would have been driven from the land, into the cities to become the workers for the RCC. To understand this phenomena Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope will be used to illustrate, specifically a review of pps. 75-77.

Beyond a doubt, the main political movement was Progressivism.

“During this same period, there appeared a new movement for economic and political reform…”

The Permanent Revolution always appears as a reform movement!

“The Progressive movement resulted from a combination of forces, some old and some new.”

Of course this refers to Morgan and Rockefeller etc.

“Its foundation rested on the remains of agrarian and labor discontent
which had struggled so vainly before 1897…”

Remember the plight of the Capitalist at this time?

Labor was getting more of the national income than the RCC up to 1897. Capital used private, state and Federal forces to quell the rising tide of opposition to the ugly spread of Capitalism.

“There was also, a kind of afterthought on the part of successful business leaders, a weakening of acquisitive selfishness and a revival of the older sense of social obligation and idealism…”

“Guess Who?” Exclaimed Woody Woodpecker!

“To some extent this feeling was mixed with a realization that the position and privileges of the very wealthy could be preserved better with superficial concessions and increased opportunity for the discontented to blow off steam that from any policy of blind obstructionism on the part of the rich…”

Remember as Capitalism spreads, the proletariat grows exponentially. The Capitalist needs the ever-growing proletariat to run the machines. So the Capitalist needed a reform movement to “Con” the proletariat into “buying into the new system” and having a “Sense of belonging”.
“As an example of the more idealistic impulse we might mention the creation of the various Carnegie foundations to work for universal peace or to extend scholarly work in Science and Social Study…”

Quigley is talking about the Trust foundations like the Rockefeller Foundation, The Carnegie endowments etc. During the “muckraking” years the Robber Barons of the mighty Industrial trusts were forced to break up their mega-monopolies… but… were allowed to shelter the wealth in these foundations (and its resultant political power).

“As an example of the more practical point of view we might mention the
founding of The New Republic, a “liberal weekly paper,” by an agent of
Morgan financed with Whitney money (1914).”

In this book the pedigree of The New Republic will be covered later. Also notice Quigley’s use of the word “Agent”.

“Some what similar to this last point was the growth of a new “liberal
press,” which found it profitable to print the writings of “Muckrakers,”
and thus expose to the public eye the seamy side of Big Business
and human nature itself.”

The Permanent Revolution has always used the manipulation of the political extremes to force reforms on the political Center. Quigley has just described this phenomenon.

There is another point of the Permanent Revolution. It is made up of many factions. Like any other political grouping there will always be a Left, Center and a Right
.
“But the great opportunity for the Progressive forces arose from a split
within Big Business between the older forces of financial Capitalism led
by Morgan and the newer forces of Monopoly Capitalism organized
around the Rockefeller bloc…”

Morgan represents the “Right Wing” and Rockefeller being the “Left Wing” of the RCC. Labor of course would be the expanding political Center.

These “newer forces of monopoly Capitalism” are the Fabians. The Fabians were the world leaders in social reforms for Capitalism/Socialism/Communism/conspiracism.

“As a consequence, the Republican Party was split between the followers
of Theodore Roosevelt and those of William Howard Taft, so that the
combined forces of the liberal East and the agrarian West were able to
capture the Presidency under Wilson in 1912.”

In the book Tragedy and Hope Quigley gives the details of the above in over 1300 pages and never once mentions the Fabians, already demonstrated in this book as the leaders of socialism. The progressive movement or Progressivism are “Cover titles” to hide the Fabians. Progressivism was dubbed liberal reform, another cover term for socialism.

Do you get the picture?

A lot of effort has gone into hiding the truth, i.e. Fabianism, from History. It was Progressivism that put Wilson in the White House, not Sydney and Beatrice Webb… Not!
Chapter 7
Fabianism in America

The Permanent Revolution is a master or should I say “the” master of confusion. Confusion only works as a tactic when this confusion is supported and proliferated. The Nazi propagandists knew something about this.

Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope is a device of confusion. Tragedy and Hope mixes fact with fiction. Sound historical facts are used to lead his readers to the fiction. When the real facts lead to the existence and importance of the Fabian Society, Quigley then uses intellectual fiction to hide the Fabian influence. This is important because Quigley was considered, at the time Tragedy and Hope was briefly on the bookstore shelves, this nation’s leading historian. This validated the created fictions.

Quigley spends many pages correctly describing the history of Cecil Rhodes (yes the scholarship Rhodes). Quigley verifies those people around Rhodes had legitimate political power. And these people were dedicated to Rhodes dream of a One World English Speaking Government. To spread Rhodes’ dream, reading clubs (since TV and Radio did not exist) called Round Tables were created and spread all over early 1900s America.

This confusion is created by the Fabian Socialists infiltration of the Round Tables.

“Rhodes’ group of acquaintances, introduced to him by Fabian socialist William T. Stead… they formed a secret society to promote further expansion of British control over the world… aiming at a future merger of Great Britain and the United States… This goal was put forth by their public organization the Round Table Groups…”

The Tax Exempt Foundations, William H. Mcllhany, II, 1980, p. 18.

If you accept Quigley’s history, one’s focus is on the Round Table groups and Rhodes’ followers… not the Fabians and the Permanent Revolution. No one knows how many Fabians infiltrated the Round Table for obvious reason it was a well-guarded secret. It is important to note the Round Table became a Fabian tool despite Quigley’s attempt to hide this most pertinent fact.

Fabian infestation is unique. The members of the Round Table are already susceptible to the idea Capitalism is bigger than any nation. Why settle for an English Speaking Imperial Empire when Capitalism can encompass the globe.

Quigley identified the creation of the progressive, liberal The New Republic. Obviously the readers of The New Republic would be from the membership of the Round Table. The New Republic has been controlled from its inception by the Fabians; not the Rhodies.

This is important. I really do not know how a respected researcher such as Quigley could miss the fact that The New Republic is just another layer upon layer of hiding the Permanent Revolution and advancing Capitalism at the same time.

The New Republic was a creation of Herbert Croly.

“He and some others were about to start a new magazine, Croly explained.
It would appear every week, cover politics and the arts, and spread the
ideas of “Constructive Nationalism.”

Walter Lippman and the American Century, Ronald Steel, 1981, p. 59.

Where did the money come from? Compare the following description of the investors for The New Republic to Quigley’s description in the previous chapter.

“…The money would come from Williard Straight and his wife Dorothy—she a Whitney and the beneficiary of many millions in Standard Oil royalties, he a Morgan banker--having helped spread the virtues of Capitalism and Christianity in pagan China. He was now eager to prepare America for their international responsibilities… and decided the country needed most was a magazine espousing the New Nationalism…”

Walter Lippman, ibid. p. 60.

Does any of this sound familiar? Are some lights and bells starting to go off? This “New Nationalism” was a cover term for Global Capitalism. The “New Nationalism” is the same Free Market Economy promised by Ronald Reagan and Clinton’s Economic Democracy.

Croly would staff The New Republic with Fabians and allied Harvard Socialists. His leading recruit was Walter Lippman.

“Croly was delighted by his acquisition. Lippman, as you say, is an
interesting mixture of maturity and innocence.”

Walter Lippman, Ibid.
What was this mix?

“… The New Republic was staffed in the beginning by a number of talented, ambitious and socially acceptable young Socialists from Harvard, who dropped the socialist label but not its program soon after graduation. Among them was the pundit columnist, Walter Lippman, who joined the Fabian Society in 1909.”

Walter Lippman, IBID. p. 59.

What did Croly and his Fabian led cronies want?

“…Only a strong central government could control and equitably distribute the benefits of Industrial Capitalism. Croly parted company with the populist strain of Progressivism by arguing that the inequities of American life could never be rectified by weakening federal power, by mechanical electoral reforms, such as referendum and recall, by breaking up the efficient trusts, by coddling the small businessman and at the expense of the consumer or by imagining that good government was that which governed least…”

Walter Lippman, IBID, p. 59.

The New Republic is just a glaring example of Fabian infiltration into the highest levels of American Society. This tactic was to be repeated all along the Progressive Political Spectrum. Even though it appeared that Capitalism was split along Morgan/Rockefeller lines, it was unified by Fabian Socialist infiltration into America’s most important institutions.

Yes, the author is aware that the American history books are devoid of Fabianism. This does not make it any less real. Fabianism fit the likes of the hundreds of Walter Lippmans.

“…reform without revolution…”

Walter Lippman, IBID. p. 23.

Chapter 8
Fabians Capture White House

RCC controlled history has recorded Woodrow Wilson’s election to the office of President in 1912 was due to Teddy Roosevelt’s creation of the Bull Moose Party which split the Republican vote. In some respects this is true but if it were not for the Fabians, Wilson would not have been President.

Roosevelt and Wilson were both Progressives. The RCC needed to capture the Presidency. The RCC Knew Roosevelt could not win an election. He had not won his party’s nomination.

And the Democrat Wilson could not have defeated his Democratic challenger in that party without Fabian assistance. The Progressive Movement, dominated by Fabians could get their program instituted through Wilson if the Bull Moose Party was formed and Wilson could get the democratic nomination. This is what happened and Wilson won the Federal election by 24 Electoral College votes.

The point: it is hard to believe the American political system, could be successfully invaded by British Socialists but that is the case.

Fabian Socialism captured the White House in 1912!

“Not only did Lippman help swing The New Republic behind Wilson, he wrote speeches for the President…”

Walter Lippman, IBID. p. 107.

But before Wilson could get elected he had to win his party’s nomination, which at the time seemed almost an impossible task.

“In the spring of 1912, few persons believed that Woodrow Wilson would stand a chance to obtain the Democratic nomination for President of the United States…”

Woodrow Wilson, His Life and Work, William
Dumseath Eaton, 1924, p. 52.

Remember Wilson and TR were progressives.

“The popularity of Col. Roosevelt was shown to be so great that the democratic leaders began to realize that if they were to win in November, they must have a standard bearer who would appeal to the people. The primary results proved disappointing in showing there was no such Democrat before the public unless it was Governor Wilson.”

Woodrow Wilson, IBID. p. 53.

The man that helped Wilson win the difficult Democratic nomination was Col. Mandel House.

“In 1912 he (House) helped Wilson capture the Democratic nomination by winning over the die-hard followers of William Jennings Bryan.”

Lippman, IBID, pps. 107-108.

House is a controversial person in history. For a short time RCC historians and pundits made like House never existed, that he was a myth. But his name shows up in too many “biographies”. If you are wondering, Quigley only mentions House in passing. House was the first “Henry Kissinger.”

Who was this guy?

“Edward Mandel House--Colonel House as he preferred to be known by his honorary Texas title-although not a cabinet official, judge or congressman, was among the most influential men in the nation. A Western Progressive who had engineered the successful gubernatorial campaign of the Texas reformer James Hogg, he had expanded his talents to a National Stage…”

Walter Lippman and the American Century,
Ronald Steel, 1980, p. 107.

Let’s take a look at the “talents” Mr. House used for the “national stage”. (Good word choice, stage).

“Edward M. House has been described… as being… highly radical, more than liberal, in the politico-social sense…”

Mr. House of Texas, Aurthor D. Howard Smith, 1940, p. 43.

“House believed the United States Constitution, creation of the eighteenth century minds, was not only outmoded, but grotesque and ought to be scrapped or rewritten…”

Mr. House of Texas, IBID. p. 23.

Now keep in mind, this was the presidential advisor to Wilson.

“… As a practical politician he realized this could not be done all at once, giving the existing state of popular education; so he favored gradual changes which, in the long run, would produce the same results…”

Fabian Freeway, Rose L. Martin, 1963, p. 157.

To continue from the Fabian Freeway,

“Late in the fall of 1912 there appeared a curious novel entitled Phillip Dru Administrator. It was published by B.W. Huebsch, a favorite publisher of the Left and for many years a valued collaborator of the American Fabian Socialist groups…”The Administrator appointed a board of economist to work out a tariff law leading to the abolition of the theory of protection as a government policy…”

Remember! This was the basic contract agreed upon by the RCC, creators of the Constitution, between the new Federal Government and the Patriot population in 1787. In essence, House was abdicating destruction of the American Revolution! Get the picture?

Hold on there is more.

“…He also instructed the board to work out a graduated income tax…”

As Hamilton and enlightened statesmen observed in 1786, if the government does not fund itself from tariffs on commerce, that funding will fall with oppressive weight upon the land and in 1786 a direct income tax could not be collected from the people.

“…Phillip Dru further called for a new banking law… to make corporations “share” with the government and states a certain part of their earnings.”

Fabian Free Way, IBID, p. 158.

Do you remember what this new banking law was to be? ( Refer back to chapter 3).

It was the Federal Reserve. It was the awakening of the RCC as a class. Keep in mind what you read earlier about the RCC’s need for a central bank in Chapter 3 of this book.

And Col. Mandel House engineered Woodrow Wilson into the White House. And just who was this Wilson?

“Wilson seemed the ideal candidate… he was a respected scholar who had been exposed since 1885 to Fabian Socialist views on economics and social sciences, he was a specialist in American history and constitutional law who wanted to see the constitution revised…”

IBID. p. 156.

Any way you look at it, there is no denying the British Fabian society, representatives of the Radical Capitalist Class, planned and executed the capture of the American executive branch of the Federal Government that existed by contract authority through the U. S. Constitution.

This was the Permanent Revolution in action. The American Republic, result of the 1776 American Revolution, joined the ranks of the European Aristocracies with the election of Wilson. The Republic had become an impediment to the global spread of Capitalism.

From 1912-1920 the United States was put through an exhaustive process of Progressive Political Reform. This was the Permanent Revolution in action. This reform process was Fabian Controlled 100%

This reform process was necessary for the RCC. It was time to end the Capitalist “Boom Bust Cycle” a result of overproduction and under-consumption before Capitalism to go global. This could only be accomplished with constant expansion of Capitalism. In order to do this America had to end its protectionism and Europe had to loose its strongly nationalistic Aristocracies. One action required “reform without revolution” and the other required World War.

Does your political peer group possess this view and very pertinent perspective of history? Such a pity.

Chapter 9
The Wilson Revolution

As noted earlier, there have been many political, economic and social writers that have described in detail some facet of the Permanent Revolution… and are totally oblivious to its existence at the same time.

One of the best histories written on the first two years of the Wilson administration (1912-1914) appears in the book Trade Wars Against America, A History of United States Trade and Monetary Policy, by William J. Gill written in 1990. Gill was a former trade negotiator for the Federal Government. Chapters 7-9, “The Attack Begins,” “The Overthrow,” and “The Federal Reserve Coup” describe in detail the Permanent Revolution “in process,” and at the same time the author is oblivious to its existence.

This chapter is going to be select quotes from those chapters. Armed with the knowledge of Fabian Ideology the reader should enjoy “the Revolution” or should it be phrased “reform without Revolution?”

(Author’s note: This author has never had contact with Mr. Gill. And the author’s concept or thesis was developed long before reading Mr. Gill’s book was published.)

“Alexander Hamilton and our other founding fathers understood that any nation that desires to remain politically independent must also protect its economic independence… The whole concept of nationhood rests upon this premise. Only those nations which intend to eventually surrender their sovereignty completely will abandon protectionism in trade to the extent that the United States has in recent decades…”

Trade Wars Against America, William J. Gill, 1990, p. xii.

Yes… Yawn… You’ve already read that but, Wow! It really must be true! Free Trade is the enemy of a Free Nation.
“If we collapse, the world will collapse with us. Therefore, it is in the interest of all countries… that America be rescued from the Free trade trap that now paralyzes so much of our economy…”

Trade Wars, IBID. xiii.

“As the twentieth century stumbled from one tragedy to the next, Americans forgot their own lesson---indeed, their own history. Amid the turmoil that increasingly compelled our citizens to focus on the crisis of the hour we lost our bearings until now, as another century beacons over the horizon, we are increasingly adrift in an uncertain sea.”

IBID, p. 44.
The author realizes this information may appear redundant but it is necessary to demonstrate what has been presented so far in this book is correct reality… not some “conspiracy theory of the lunatic fringe.”

“The Progressives, basing their arguments on the deepening public suspicion of trusts and monopolies, prepared to wage war on four fronts…

The first had as its objective the demise of the tariff. However, the substantial revenues that would be lost by killing off the tariff had to be replaced and that was to be the function of the graduated income tax, the second front of the attack.”

IBID. p. 47.

These are Fabian Progressive reforms, not Marxist ideology!

“The other two fronts, opened almost simultaneously, were, third, the restoration of the Central Bank… and… fourth an amendment to the Constitution to elect U.S. Senators by popular vote instead of by the state legislatures as the founding fathers has stipulated.”

IBID.

Now the Revolution.

“The opening battle was the debate over a new tariff act in 1909…the focus of the battle in Congress became not so much the tariff per se as the income tax which was to replace it… President William Howard Taft… proposed an income tax on corporations that was to serve as a revenue source while the constitutional amendment was wending it way through the state legislatures. The corporate levy was euphemistically termed an excise tax to get around the Constitution.

IBID. p. 48.

What was created was the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act. One must always assume any Fabian legislation pertaining to the Permanent Revolution as a Trojan Horse. There will always something inside you definitely will not like.

“… Payne-Aldrich introduced a dangerous heresy into the administration of the tariff which in the end was to utterly destroy the protectionist principle upon which this nation was built.”

IBID.

What was the damage caused by the Fabians?

“The first crack had been opened in the protectionist wall that for 120 years had guarded the interests of the workers and industry, agriculture and commerce of the United States…

… Yet like so many other things in the long, slow surrender of the Constitution by the legislative branch and the repeated usurptations of authority by the executive and judiciary, the transfer of power over the nation’s foreign trade was acquiesced by a public made malleable by misinformation…

…For the income tax, and the greatly expanded Internal Revenue Service it spawned, enabled the government to force open the doors into our homes and offices and privacy on a scale Washington, Hamilton, Jefferson and the other founders could have never conceived.”

IBID. p. 49.

Payne-Aldrich paved the road that would lead to Wilson’s pet project, the Underwood Tariff Act of 1913.

“This revolutionary act set this nation on the road to the Free Trade system which now prevails… since 1913 the United States has been committed to free Trade.”

IBID. p. 54.

In short, the Fabians paved the way for the RCC to have its much needed Free Trade that was dead in 1900. So much for the impediment presented by the American Republic.
Chapter 10
War Changes All Things

World War I and its results and Fabian machinations probably altered the course of world history on par with the crucifixion of Christ. This author is not claiming the RCC’s Fabian Society created WWI. This author does make the claim the RCC’s Fabian Society was prepared for the aftermath of WWI.

It had politically strategic positions and influence within and outside the U.S. Federal Government.

As observed earlier in this book the Monopoly Robber Barons were allowed to dissolve their corporate combines… and keep the wealth. The most prominent examples were the Carnegie and Ford various foundations.

Much of the foundation’s books and papers were circulated through Round Table groups that were dominated by Fabians. The Round Table Groups could be described in this manner.

“…The disingenuous character of the Round Table appeared in three ways: (1) it pretended to be a study group when it was really an organization of propaganda and influence armed at influencing policy; (2) it pretended to represent diverse opinions when as a matter of fact it insisted on unanimity (at least in the London group) and eliminated diverse points of view very quickly; (3) it pretended to be co-operative organization on an inter-dominion basis when in fact everything of real significance was controlled from London. A fourth, and in some ways more significant example, which cannot be examined here, was the fact that it pretended to be a single autonomous agency when in fact it was a multiple, ubiquitous entity whose influence was exercised through many agencies, including professorships, periodicals, and other organizations (such as Chatham House, The Institute of Pacific Relations or the Council of Foreign Relations)…”

Tragedy and Hope, Quigley, pp. 218-219.

In 1953 the foundations were investigated by Congress. One of the witnesses against the foundations was Norman Dodd. Assisting Mr. Dodd was Kathryn Casey, an attorney whose function was to make sure there were no improprieties in this Congressional investigation. Following are excerpts from Dodd’s Congressional testimony (From the book The Tax-Exepmt Fondations, William H. Mcllhany, II, 1980) transcript of Casey’s report of a review of Carnegie Endorsement for Peace minutes from 1910-1920.

“[In the minutes about 1911] the trustees raised a question. And they discussed the question and the question was specific, “Is there any means known to man more effective than war, assuming you wished to alter life of an entire people?” And they discussed this and at the end of a year they came to the conclusion that there was no effective means to that end known to man. So, they raised question #2, and the question was, “How do we involve the United States in a War …?”

Remember the Fabians wanted to create an environment for international Free Trade in America and Europe and also wanted to eliminate the “protectionist principles” that were written into the fabric of the US Constitution. Yes, a case can be made War was to be used to accomplish Fabian goals. Continuing Dodd’s testimony:

“And then they raised the question, “How do we control the diplomatic machinery of the United States?” And the answer came out, “We” must control the State Department.”

It has been demonstrated in this book, that the Fabian controlled Colonel Mandel House engineered the election of the Fabian influenced Woodrow Wilson to be President of the United States in 1912. It is very believable the Carnegie Endowment for Peace could control the State Department. Continuing the Dodd congressional testimony:

“At this point we catch up with what we had already found out and that was that through an Agency set up by the Carnegie Endowment every high appointment in the State Department was cleared.”

Just so you understand, the Fabians controlled the US Presidency and State Department by 1914. For whatever reasons and there were many of them, Europe erupted in War in 1914. The majority of Americans were not interested in European affairs, besides this attitude was good enough for George Washington, Hero of the American Revolution. But you know how war can change things. To continue Mr. Dodds congressional testimony:

“Finally we were in a war. These Trustees in a meeting about 1917 had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom of their original decision because already the impact of the War had indicated it would alter life and can alter life in this country…”

Now here comes the bullet!

“This was the date of our entry into the war; we were involved. They even had the brashness to word and to dispatch a telegram to Mr. Wilson, cautioning him to see that the war did not end too quickly.”

Please understand, when President Wilson delivered his War proposal to Congress for debate, (the Constitution provides the Congress the power to invite the President to be Commander in Chief should a state of war exist) the RCC was already preparing for events after the World War I long before the Fabians drug this nation into the conflict.

The events that lead to the American involvement into WWI are curious indeed. Bear in mind England and France were running out of two commodities necessary to Wage modern warfare, money and men. By 1917 Germany’s military intelligence had started a plan to remove Russia from the War, freeing up 1 million men for the Western Front.

By 1918, the world as most Americans knew it was to change forever!

Chapter 11
The Road to War

The clash of Europe’s strongly nationalistic Aristocracies, bolstered by their domestic Capitalism fueled the antagonism amongst the Imperialist belligerents to create WWI. Each Empire was struggling to establish dominance. To the many different Marxist factions this was the final conflict that would end Capitalism’s push for dominance over mankind.

But the war was reducing each Capitalist supported monarchy to dangerous levels of vulnerability. As the war raged on, the Bolshevik mentality was gaining growing acceptance amongst the industrial populations of the belligerents. This was due in a great part from RCC financing and political assistance in Europe and the United States.

So in 1917:

Britain was literally out of men and money for the fight in 1917.
Entire French divisions were staging uncontrolled mutinies at the Front.
Germany was ready to send 1 million men to be freed from the Russian Front.
Food Riots were breaking out in American East Coast population centers because American transportation was at a standstill; a result of German unrestricted, submarine warfare preventing shipping which was tying up loaded railcars at east coast ports.

Then comes the Fabian forced American entry into the war. All was to change.

With American entry into the war, an allied victory was a sure thing. If the Kaiser won, the RCC would suffer a great defeat. America’s entry into the war was inevitable to prevent this “Kaiser” victory.
The Radical Capitalist Class (RCC) through the Fabian Socialist set U.S. policy during WWI. Even though the United States did not participate during the bulk of WWI; the RCC Fabians would control the outcome of the peace negotiations. RCC controlled historians and educators all falsely record Woodrow Wilson provided and dominated the Versailles Treaty talks with the famous “14 point” program to ensure world peace through the creation of a global League of Nations.

The aristocracies of Russia, Germany, Austro-Hungarian Empire and Italy “evaporated” at the end of WWI. A large political void and vacuum existed in Europe.

The RCC Fabian Socialist were prepared to fill that void. They were very much in the position and had the influence to change the basic fabric of American and European societies.

One of the most important myths of history was Wilson was the author and creator of the 14 Point Plan. When in reality this document was the creation of the Fabian Society through a very secret organization called the “Inquiry.” Again RCC historians and educators would hide another example of Fabian control of great historical importance. For example, consult the index of Tragedy and Hope.

Remember, when America entered WWI, Wilson told the populace, that U.S. entry into WWI was to make the “World Safe for Democracy.”

Please ponder this War slogan a moment.

This country is a Republic, not a Democracy. President Wilson requested Congress for a Deceleration of War against Germany in early April of 1917. All the Congress and President were sworn to uphold the Constitution and preserve the Republic…not make “the World Safe for Democracy.”
Wouldn’t a logical slogan have been “Protect the Republic?” George Washington would not have considered joining the carnage that was wiping out the flower of European societies, just for the establishment of European Democracy!

So, what does this have to do with the Permanent Revolution?

Remember, for Capitalism to keep spreading; many major obstacles have to be continually removed. For Capitalism to spread, it needs Free Trade to build a Free Market Economy. Strong nationalistic Aristocracies, supported by their growing domestic Capitalism prevented Fabian Capitalism from removing its two major obstacles: (1) Nationalism and (2) correcting Capitalism’s fatal flaw of overproduction and under consumption­the Bottleneck